Home/AI Models/Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Gemini 3.5 Flash VS GPT-5.6 Luna

Google · OpenAI · AI Models · Updated Jul 26, 2026

🏆
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI · GPT-5.6 Luna is 50.0% cheaper
WINNER
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Input Price
$1.50/1M tkns
Output Price
$7.50/1M tkns
Specs
context window1048576
modalitiestext+image+file+audio+video->text
visiontrue
★ Best Value
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

Input Price
$1.00/1M tkns
Output Price
$6.00/1M tkns
Specs
context window1050000
modalitiestext+image+file->text
visiontrue

Side-by-Side Breakdown

FeatureGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-5.6 LunaWinner
Input Price$1.50/1M tkns$1.00/1M tknsGPT-5.6 Luna
Output Price$7.50/1M tkns$6.00/1M tknsGPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Categoryai-modelai-model
context window10485761050000
modalitiestext+image+file+audio+video->texttext+image+file->text
visiontruetrue
Overall Winner🏆GPT-5.6 Luna

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna: Quick Summary

GPT-5.6 Luna is the more affordable choice. Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50/1M tkns vs GPT-5.6 Luna at $1.00/1M tkns (Input Price). GPT-5.6 Luna is 50.0% cheaper. Pricing verified as of Jul 26, 2026 — always confirm on the provider's official pricing page before committing.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna: Full Pricing Analysis

On headline price, GPT-5.6 Luna is the cheaper option: $1.00/1M tkns versus $1.50/1M tkns for Gemini 3.5 Flash (Input Price) — about 33% less. At a scale of one million per 1M tokens, that difference works out to roughly $1,000.00 with GPT-5.6 Luna against $1,500.00 with Gemini 3.5 Flash. For high-volume workloads that gap compounds quickly, so if your usage is predictable and large, GPT-5.6 Luna is the more economical default.

Price isn’t the whole story, though. Gemini 3.5 Flash (Google) sits at the higher price point, which is often justified by broader features, stronger delivery/SLA guarantees, or a more mature developer experience. If you need those capabilities, the premium can pay for itself. Choose GPT-5.6 Luna when cost-per-unit is the priority and your requirements are straightforward; choose Gemini 3.5 Flash when reliability, tooling, or ecosystem fit matter more than shaving the per-unit rate.

Beyond price, the two differ on context window (1048576 vs 1050000), modalities (text+image+file+audio+video->text vs text+image+file->text) and vision (true vs true). Check those specs against your actual requirements before committing — the cheaper option is only the better deal if it also meets your technical needs.

Pricing shown is Input Price as published by each provider and verified Jul 26, 2026. Providers change prices and introduce free tiers and volume discounts frequently — always confirm the current rate on Google’s and OpenAI’s official pricing pages before you commit.

Also Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash with

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 TerraGemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5

Also Compare GPT-5.6 Luna with

GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Sonnet 5
← All AI Models Comparisons