Home/AI Models/Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.7 Max

Llama 4 Maverick VS Qwen3.7 Max

Meta · Alibaba · AI Models · Updated Jul 26, 2026

🏆
Llama 4 MaverickMeta · Llama 4 Maverick is 86.4% cheaper
WINNER
★ Best Value
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Input Price
$0.200/1M tkns
Output Price
$0.800/1M tkns
Specs
context window1048576
modalitiestext+image->text
visiontrue
Alibaba

Qwen3.7 Max

Input Price
$1.47/1M tkns
Output Price
$4.42/1M tkns
Specs
context window1000000
modalitiestext->text
visionfalse

Side-by-Side Breakdown

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.7 MaxWinner
Input Price$0.200/1M tkns$1.47/1M tknsLlama 4 Maverick
Output Price$0.800/1M tkns$4.42/1M tknsLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderMetaAlibaba
Categoryai-modelai-model
context window10485761000000
modalitiestext+image->texttext->text
visiontruefalse
Overall Winner🏆Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.7 Max: Quick Summary

Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable choice. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.200/1M tkns vs Qwen3.7 Max at $1.47/1M tkns (Input Price). Llama 4 Maverick is 86.4% cheaper. Pricing verified as of Jul 26, 2026 — always confirm on the provider's official pricing page before committing.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.7 Max: Full Pricing Analysis

On headline price, Llama 4 Maverick is the cheaper option: $0.200/1M tkns versus $1.47/1M tkns for Qwen3.7 Max (Input Price) — about 86% less. At a scale of one million per 1M tokens, that difference works out to roughly $200.00 with Llama 4 Maverick against $1,475.00 with Qwen3.7 Max. For high-volume workloads that gap compounds quickly, so if your usage is predictable and large, Llama 4 Maverick is the more economical default.

Price isn’t the whole story, though. Qwen3.7 Max (Alibaba) sits at the higher price point, which is often justified by broader features, stronger delivery/SLA guarantees, or a more mature developer experience. If you need those capabilities, the premium can pay for itself. Choose Llama 4 Maverick when cost-per-unit is the priority and your requirements are straightforward; choose Qwen3.7 Max when reliability, tooling, or ecosystem fit matter more than shaving the per-unit rate.

Beyond price, the two differ on context window (1048576 vs 1000000), modalities (text+image->text vs text->text) and vision (true vs false). Check those specs against your actual requirements before committing — the cheaper option is only the better deal if it also meets your technical needs.

Pricing shown is Input Price as published by each provider and verified Jul 26, 2026. Providers change prices and introduce free tiers and volume discounts frequently — always confirm the current rate on Meta’s and Alibaba’s official pricing pages before you commit.

Also Compare Llama 4 Maverick with

Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.6 LunaLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.6 TerraLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Also Compare Qwen3.7 Max with

Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 LunaQwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 TerraQwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 Sol
← All AI Models Comparisons