Home/AI Models/Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Llama 4 Scout VS Mistral Medium 3.5

Meta · Mistral · AI Models · Updated Jul 26, 2026

🏆
Llama 4 ScoutMeta · Llama 4 Scout is 93.3% cheaper
WINNER
★ Best Value
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Input Price
$0.100/1M tkns
Output Price
$0.300/1M tkns
Specs
context window1310720
modalitiestext+image->text
visiontrue
Mistral

Mistral Medium 3.5

Input Price
$1.50/1M tkns
Output Price
$7.50/1M tkns
Specs
context window262144
modalitiestext+image+file->text
visiontrue

Side-by-Side Breakdown

FeatureLlama 4 ScoutMistral Medium 3.5Winner
Input Price$0.100/1M tkns$1.50/1M tknsLlama 4 Scout
Output Price$0.300/1M tkns$7.50/1M tknsLlama 4 Scout
ProviderMetaMistral
Categoryai-modelai-model
context window1310720262144
modalitiestext+image->texttext+image+file->text
visiontruetrue
Overall Winner🏆Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Quick Summary

Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable choice. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.100/1M tkns vs Mistral Medium 3.5 at $1.50/1M tkns (Input Price). Llama 4 Scout is 93.3% cheaper. Pricing verified as of Jul 26, 2026 — always confirm on the provider's official pricing page before committing.

Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Full Pricing Analysis

On headline price, Llama 4 Scout is the cheaper option: $0.100/1M tkns versus $1.50/1M tkns for Mistral Medium 3.5 (Input Price) — about 93% less. At a scale of one million per 1M tokens, that difference works out to roughly $100.00 with Llama 4 Scout against $1,500.00 with Mistral Medium 3.5. For high-volume workloads that gap compounds quickly, so if your usage is predictable and large, Llama 4 Scout is the more economical default.

Price isn’t the whole story, though. Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral) sits at the higher price point, which is often justified by broader features, stronger delivery/SLA guarantees, or a more mature developer experience. If you need those capabilities, the premium can pay for itself. Choose Llama 4 Scout when cost-per-unit is the priority and your requirements are straightforward; choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when reliability, tooling, or ecosystem fit matter more than shaving the per-unit rate.

Beyond price, the two differ on context window (1310720 vs 262144), modalities (text+image->text vs text+image+file->text) and vision (true vs true). Check those specs against your actual requirements before committing — the cheaper option is only the better deal if it also meets your technical needs.

Pricing shown is Input Price as published by each provider and verified Jul 26, 2026. Providers change prices and introduce free tiers and volume discounts frequently — always confirm the current rate on Meta’s and Mistral’s official pricing pages before you commit.

Also Compare Llama 4 Scout with

Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-5.6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-5.6 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Also Compare Mistral Medium 3.5 with

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.6 LunaMistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.6 TerraMistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
← All AI Models Comparisons