Home/AI Models/Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Mistral Medium 3.5 VS Qwen3.7 Max

Mistral · Alibaba · AI Models · Updated Aug 16, 2026

🏆
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral · Mistral Medium 3.5 is 25.0% cheaper
WINNER
★ Best Value
Mistral

Mistral Medium 3.5

Input Price
$1.50/1M tkns
Output Price
$7.50/1M tkns
Specs
context window262144
modalitiestext+image+file->text
visiontrue
Alibaba

Qwen3.7 Max

Input Price
$2.00/1M tkns
Output Price
$6.00/1M tkns
Specs
context window1000000
modalitiestext+image+video->text
visiontrue

Side-by-Side Breakdown

FeatureMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.7 MaxWinner
Input Price$1.50/1M tkns$2.00/1M tknsMistral Medium 3.5
Output Price$7.50/1M tkns$6.00/1M tknsQwen3.7 Max
ProviderMistralAlibaba
Categoryai-modelai-model
context window2621441000000
modalitiestext+image+file->texttext+image+video->text
visiontruetrue
Overall Winner🏆Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max: Quick Summary

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the more affordable choice. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50/1M tkns vs Qwen3.7 Max at $2.00/1M tkns (Input Price). Mistral Medium 3.5 is 25.0% cheaper. Pricing verified as of Aug 16, 2026 — always confirm on the provider's official pricing page before committing.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max: Full Pricing Analysis

On headline price, Mistral Medium 3.5 is the cheaper option: $1.50/1M tkns versus $2.00/1M tkns for Qwen3.7 Max (Input Price) — about 25% less. At a scale of one million per 1M tokens, that difference works out to roughly $1,500.00 with Mistral Medium 3.5 against $2,000.00 with Qwen3.7 Max. For high-volume workloads that gap compounds quickly, so if your usage is predictable and large, Mistral Medium 3.5 is the more economical default.

Price isn’t the whole story, though. Qwen3.7 Max (Alibaba) sits at the higher price point, which is often justified by broader features, stronger delivery/SLA guarantees, or a more mature developer experience. If you need those capabilities, the premium can pay for itself. Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when cost-per-unit is the priority and your requirements are straightforward; choose Qwen3.7 Max when reliability, tooling, or ecosystem fit matter more than shaving the per-unit rate.

Beyond price, the two differ on context window (262144 vs 1000000), modalities (text+image+file->text vs text+image+video->text) and vision (true vs true). Check those specs against your actual requirements before committing — the cheaper option is only the better deal if it also meets your technical needs.

Pricing shown is Input Price as published by each provider and verified Aug 16, 2026. Providers change prices and introduce free tiers and volume discounts frequently — always confirm the current rate on Mistral’s and Alibaba’s official pricing pages before you commit.

Also Compare Mistral Medium 3.5 with

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.6 LunaMistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.6 TerraMistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Also Compare Qwen3.7 Max with

Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 LunaQwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 TerraQwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 Sol
← All AI Models Comparisons