Home/Cloud Storage/Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

Amazon S3 VS Google Cloud Storage

AWS · Google · Cloud Storage · Updated Jul 26, 2026

🏆
Google Cloud StorageGoogle · Google Cloud Storage is 15.0% cheaper
WINNER
AWS

Amazon S3

Storage /GB/mo
$0.0230/GB/mo
Egress /GB
$0.0900/GB
Specs
redundancy3× AZ
durability11 nines
s3 compatibleNative
free tier5GB/mo
★ Best Value
Google

Google Cloud Storage

Storage /GB/mo
$0.0200/GB/mo
Egress /GB
$0.1200/GB
Specs
redundancyMulti-region
durability11 nines
s3 compatiblePartial
free tier5GB/mo

Side-by-Side Breakdown

FeatureAmazon S3Google Cloud StorageWinner
Storage /GB/mo$0.0230/GB/mo$0.0200/GB/moGoogle Cloud Storage
Egress /GB$0.0900/GB$0.1200/GBAmazon S3
ProviderAWSGoogle
Categorycloud-storagecloud-storage
redundancy3× AZMulti-region
durability11 nines11 nines
s3 compatibleNativePartial
free tier5GB/mo5GB/mo
Overall Winner🏆Google Cloud Storage

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage: Quick Summary

Google Cloud Storage is the more affordable choice. Amazon S3 costs $0.0230/GB/mo vs Google Cloud Storage at $0.0200/GB/mo (Storage /GB/mo). Google Cloud Storage is 15.0% cheaper. Pricing verified as of Jul 26, 2026 — always confirm on the provider's official pricing page before committing.

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage: Full Pricing Analysis

On headline price, Google Cloud Storage is the cheaper option: $0.0200/GB/mo versus $0.0230/GB/mo for Amazon S3 (Storage /GB/mo) — about 13% less. At a scale of one million per GBmonth, that difference works out to roughly $20,000.00 with Google Cloud Storage against $23,000.00 with Amazon S3. For high-volume workloads that gap compounds quickly, so if your usage is predictable and large, Google Cloud Storage is the more economical default.

Price isn’t the whole story, though. Amazon S3 (AWS) sits at the higher price point, which is often justified by broader features, stronger delivery/SLA guarantees, or a more mature developer experience. If you need those capabilities, the premium can pay for itself. Choose Google Cloud Storage when cost-per-unit is the priority and your requirements are straightforward; choose Amazon S3 when reliability, tooling, or ecosystem fit matter more than shaving the per-unit rate.

Beyond price, the two differ on redundancy (3× AZ vs Multi-region), durability (11 nines vs 11 nines), s3 compatible (Native vs Partial) and free tier (5GB/mo vs 5GB/mo). Check those specs against your actual requirements before committing — the cheaper option is only the better deal if it also meets your technical needs.

Pricing shown is Storage /GB/mo as published by each provider and verified Jul 26, 2026. Providers change prices and introduce free tiers and volume discounts frequently — always confirm the current rate on AWS’s and Google’s official pricing pages before you commit.

Also Compare Amazon S3 with

Amazon S3 vs Azure Blob StorageAmazon S3 vs Backblaze B2Amazon S3 vs Wasabi

Also Compare Google Cloud Storage with

Google Cloud Storage vs Azure Blob StorageGoogle Cloud Storage vs Backblaze B2Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi
← All Cloud Storage Comparisons