Home/Cloud Storage/Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi

Google Cloud Storage VS Wasabi

Google · Wasabi · Cloud Storage · Updated Oct 25, 2026

🏆
WasabiWasabi · Wasabi is 194.1% cheaper
WINNER
Google

Google Cloud Storage

Storage /GB/mo
$0.0200/GB/mo
Egress /GB
$0.1200/GB
Specs
redundancyMulti-region
durability11 nines
s3 compatiblePartial
free tier5GB/mo
★ Best Value
Wasabi

Wasabi

Storage /GB/mo
$0.0068/GB/mo
Egress /GB
Free
Specs
redundancy3×
durability11 nines
s3 compatibleYes
free tierNone
egress policyFree

Side-by-Side Breakdown

FeatureGoogle Cloud StorageWasabiWinner
Storage /GB/mo$0.0200/GB/mo$0.0068/GB/mo✓ Wasabi
Egress /GB$0.1200/GBFree—
ProviderGoogleWasabi—
Categorycloud-storagecloud-storage—
redundancyMulti-region3×
durability11 nines11 nines
s3 compatiblePartialYes
free tier5GB/moNone
Overall Winner🏆Wasabi

Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi: Quick Summary

Wasabi is the more affordable choice. Google Cloud Storage costs $0.0200/GB/mo vs Wasabi at $0.0068/GB/mo (Storage /GB/mo). Wasabi is 194.1% cheaper. Pricing verified as of Oct 25, 2026 — always confirm on the provider's official pricing page before committing.

Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi: Full Pricing Analysis

On headline price, Wasabi is the cheaper option: $0.0068/GB/mo versus $0.0200/GB/mo for Google Cloud Storage (Storage /GB/mo) — about 66% less. At a scale of one million per GBmonth, that difference works out to roughly $6,800.00 with Wasabi against $20,000.00 with Google Cloud Storage. For high-volume workloads that gap compounds quickly, so if your usage is predictable and large, Wasabi is the more economical default.

Price isn’t the whole story, though. Google Cloud Storage (Google) sits at the higher price point, which is often justified by broader features, stronger delivery/SLA guarantees, or a more mature developer experience. If you need those capabilities, the premium can pay for itself. Choose Wasabi when cost-per-unit is the priority and your requirements are straightforward; choose Google Cloud Storage when reliability, tooling, or ecosystem fit matter more than shaving the per-unit rate.

Beyond price, the two differ on redundancy (Multi-region vs 3×), durability (11 nines vs 11 nines), s3 compatible (Partial vs Yes) and free tier (5GB/mo vs None). Check those specs against your actual requirements before committing — the cheaper option is only the better deal if it also meets your technical needs.

Pricing shown is Storage /GB/mo as published by each provider and verified Oct 25, 2026. Providers change prices and introduce free tiers and volume discounts frequently — always confirm the current rate on Google’s and Wasabi’s official pricing pages before you commit.

Also Compare Google Cloud Storage with

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon S3 →Google Cloud Storage vs Azure Blob Storage →Google Cloud Storage vs Backblaze B2 →

Also Compare Wasabi with

Wasabi vs Amazon S3 →Wasabi vs Azure Blob Storage →Wasabi vs Backblaze B2 →
← All Cloud Storage Comparisons